Kimind Consulting - About

A chinese lion statue

Enterprise 2.0: how to bring productivity, innovation and competitivity for companies growth thanks to the adoption of the new participative technologies and their induced organizations.

Kimind, founded by Miguel Membrado in 2007, is a consulting and coaching company which help on a daily basis large companies, SMBs, executives and entrepreneurs to evolve with the great social, organizational and technological revolutions we know today.

With more than 20 years of experience as entrepreneurs in IT and as consultants within large companies, Kimind provides to its customers unique solutions, pragmatics and efficients, to never be behind the market dans to reach the maximum capability of innovation and competitivity.

The blog

Enterprise 2.0 and Corporate Governance

Miguel May 1st, 2008

(This article has been originally published in the 7th eSangathan newsletter)

What are the links between e-management, web 2.0 and corporate governance? They are in the fact that it is more and more clear every day that participatory tools and collaborative working environments are changing drastically the human interactions within corporations, and impacting first the organization and the management. For the benefit of the corporation itself, thanks to the raise of a new level of collective intelligence, and a new standard of productivity.

The use of participatory technologies in the company is changing radically relationships between individuals. Breacking top-down hierarchies, we are moving to a Network Centric Management, where the supervisor will no longer base its legitimacy on its authority to direct the work of others, but where he’ll be at the same time coordinator, moderator, advisor and arbitrator of his teams and employees.

Lying, incompetence and other bad habits of a lot of deviated organizations that can be more easily concealed in an authoritarian management, will be unveiled in broad daylight in a participatory management imposed by the use of this new tools.

The introduction of these technologies in the enterprise, and even within the extended enterprise (customers, partners and subcontractors), will change this things, it is inevitable. Why? Because in the same way, when intranets arrived in the companies, they were sometimes promoted by the hierarchy, but most often they were growing from the grassroots, under the radar, because the need was too strong to prevent people to deploy them. People wanted to publish information without constraints. But a few years later, IT people succeeded to master this freedom, and intranets became again a hierarchical organization for content production. So the intranets were at the beginning a cultural revolution in most of our businesses, but at the end the impact in terms of management finally was very weak.

It’s totally different with the participatory web, where the questioning of management is complete, and hence the organization of the enterprise itself. That is why we can replace the previous-decade-words “e-management” with “Management 2.0″, and “e-organization” with “Enterprise 2.0″.. Not to be hype with a « 2.0 » acronym, but because the prefix “e-” hasn’t been disruptive for organizations and management. The “2.0″ prefix by contrast illustrates this qualitative and fundamental leap that we can no longer go back.

The Enterprise 2.0 will be a cross-organization, where information will flow seamlessly and securely, and where the creativity of everyone will be unleashed giving to everybody the opportunity to write, to say, to show, to talk, to share, to discuss, to participate, and ultimately to build together.

Other virtues will then appear as a result of these liberation, such as individual and collective efficiency, increased productivity, quality improvment and transparency.

Business leaders, from large and small organizations, that will anticipate the first these new usages, both within and outside their company, will be the first to reap the real benefits of this new corporate governance. It is necessary to invest massively, to train and support users, from the assistant to the CEO, because adopting these practices doesn’t happen overnight.

This is not about learning to use a software and pushing buttons. This is about thinking and acting differently, working differently, establishing different relationships, and this will not be done in a day, but in several months. It’s why the change must start as soon as possible in order to reap the benefits as soon as possible as well.

We must all commit ourselves to evangelize. We are on a fertile ground, because we are not at this disruption level only thanks to the technology. We are facing the convergence of two fundamental factors: (1) technology, and (2) the changing usages due to the Internet being here now for many years.

Most of the technologies of the Web 2.0 have nothing revolutionary, and some of them exist for over a decade! But they have spread this recent years very quickly because human beings were ready to receive and exploit them.

We’ve reached the limits of our actual organizations, and it is not possible to gain in daily productivity continuing to use the same tools (files, emails, and legacy systems) with the same organizations, because this tools are not anymore helping to improve these organizations. They are even creating more and more disorganization, and people are a lot more conscious of this now.

This is why we are in the good momentum, because the consciousness and the demand exist. We must therefore push both managers and users to be trained to these new usages, in order to implode the traditional business models and managements, and usher them in a new era of corporate governance, an era where individual, its efficiency, creativity, and its relationship to the team and the corporation, will be at the very heart of economics and social growth the next few years, for the benefit of all.

Miguel Membrado (May 1st, 2008)

Identificateurs Technorati : , , ,

About the Enterprise 2.0 and why it is so important to adopt these concepts asap

Miguel April 26th, 2008

Under the eSaganthan international conference held in Bombay (Mumbai), I gave a lecture on the Enterprise 2.0, where I unveil publicly for the first time the different concepts that I develop with my clients over the past several months.

I explain why our companies must move as quickly as possible to this new step, necessary to simply exceed the limits where are stuck their current organizations.

Without adopting the concepts of Enterprise 2.0 as soon as possible, our organizations will be unable to present a new quantum leap in terms of individual and collective productivity, because traditional information systems, and the organizations and management methods being associated become brakes, even a disorganization factor in many cases.

Only a real disruption in the organisation, that of the Enterprise 2.0, allow today to restore rationality and optimization in the daily work of individuals and teams for their benefit and that of enterprises.

(the lecture had been filmed, the video arrives in a few days with more details on my words)

Technorati tags: , , , , ,


Slides’ text:
Slide 1: Kimind Consulting Kimind Consulting Towards Enterprise 2.0 – Strategy, Consulting & Coaching The Enterprise 2.0 Miguel Membrado Founder & CEO membrado@kimind.com Phone: +1 650 352 3372

Slide 2: 20 years of evolutionConsulting Kimind in CWE Kimind Consulting massive adoption Informational Dimension Heterarchical Web 2.0 (Participatory) Real Time Organizational Dimension Wikis Blogs Kimind Quadrant Web-based workspaces Traditional Collaborative Solutions (Lotus, Microsoft, …) Hierarchical Structured Unstructured © 2006-2008, Miguel Membrado – Kimind Consulting low adoption (knowledge)

Slide 3: Towards Enterprise 2.0 Kimind Consulting Kimind Consulting What is Enterprise 2.0  Evolution in organization, management and methodologies  8 technical pillars: wiki + blog + search + social bookmarking +  customized home pages + RSS + social networks For which benefits  Individual and collective productivity growth  Better: competitiveness and innovation ; collective intelligence ;  talent and customer loyalty Five Key concepts  The end of the e-mail/file era  Participation Age  Simplicity  Extended Organizations  Radical transparency 

Slide 4: A Disruption in the Daily Work Kimind Consulting Kimind Consulting e-Mail Internet Explorer MSOffice Local and Shared Files Traditional Daily Work Organization Inter-personal collaboration ; disorganization ; saturation ; waste ; redundancy ; information loss ; inefficiency ; complexity ; high costs ; … HOW TO BE MORE PRODUCTIVE? WE HAVE REACHED A LIMIT! IMPOSSIBLE TO GO BEYOND WITHOUT A DISRUPTION… FireFox (open source) RSS Feeds Online Office Wiki Webmail/Chat Blog New Daily Work Organization rationalization ; organization ; team collaboration ; information repositories ; accumulation ; productivity ; simplicity ; low costs ; remote working ; …

Slide 5: Rationalization & Kimind Consulting Optimization Kimind Consulting BEFORE: Production+ e-Mail + attachments MS Office Local & Shared Files Communication+ Storage AFTER: Collaborative Production Wiki Interactive Communication Blog Collaborative Watch Social Bookmarking Collaborative Office Automation Online Office Information Consumption Customized Home Pages RSS Feeds & Monitoring Interpersonal Communication & alerts Webmail + Chat Socialization + social directories Enterprise Social Networks

Slide 6: HOW TO EVOLVE Kimind Consulting Kimind Consulting Informational Dimension Heterarchical (Participatory) Management Evolution Organizational Dimension Your organization tomorrow Kimind Quadrant IS Evolution Your organization today Hierarchical Structured Unstructured © 2006-2008, Miguel Membrado – Kimind (knowledge)

Slide 7: Conclusion Kimind Consulting Kimind Consulting A new step in terms of individual and collective  productivity is now possible By adopting Web 2.0 new usages for the Enterprise  Corporation Feedbacks from large accounts  exist for a few years The end of Microsoft supremacy on the desktop  Don’t be late to evolve  The change must be done TODAY…  … because there is a learning curve  … because your competitors will do it also 

NETCIPIA ANNOUNCES ITS “ONLINE EXPERTISE MONETIZATION PLATFORM”

Miguel March 31st, 2008

PRESS RELEASE

San Francisco, March 26 2008

NetcipiahomepageNetcipia, a Web 2.0 company founded in 2006 by Bruno de Beauregard and Miguel Membrado (former co-founders of Mayetic) in Palo Alto, has
launched the new version of its free online participative platform
.

This new version boasts advanced wiki-type functionalities that place Netcipia amongst the 10 top wiki platforms worldwide in terms of features and ergonomics.

Better yet! The first Web 2.0 service to offer both free and unlimited wikis and blogs within a single interface, Netcipia innovates again by enabling its users to charge for the online content they provide.

Netcipia place owners can charge for their content by offering:

  • Weekly, monthly or yearly subscriptions giving access to the entire Netcipia Place.
  • Fee-based access to specific pages within the Place.
  • Time-limited access to the Place.

Whereas historically, advertisement has been the only way for users to earn some income for the content they provide, Netcipia
now enables every professional or expert-amateur to use the power of
Web 2.0 to build, expand and manage participative communities as well
as charge for valuable content
. In exchange for this service, there are not fixed costs: Netcipia will only charge a percentage for every transaction.

Consultants, teachers, gardeners, architects have already begun using
their Netcipia participative communities as a lucrative business tool,
using one or several of the three payment models available.

However, Netcipia can still be used free of charge to create one or several wiki/blog communities.

Netcipia therefore offers a Win/Win proposition:
Users can benefit from the Netcipia platform free-of charge to build
their community and offer their content worldwide, until they are able
to generate some income by monetizing their content through the use of
the Netcipia Online Expertise Monetization Platform.

The strengths of Google Sites

Miguel March 25th, 2008

Having listed the limitations of Google Sites (it is always easier to criticize first …) here are the strengths that I found after 3 weeks of fairly intensive use with my clients:

  • Simplicity: everything is clear and fluid. It is the strength of Google to arrive with a very simple interface to produce things quite complex. One user, even a beginner, will understand quickly how it works. Apart from the problem of always having to create pages and link them with each other, which is not always easy to understand the first time.
  • Minimalism: the counterpart of simplicity, but the balance is in Google Sites. For power users it is of
    course a pain, but for 90% of users in an enterprise, it will be quite substantial. Each feature in Google Sites displays just the options they need, not more, not less. So, in fact, even a power user can adapt himself his requirements to use successfuly Google Site. And unlike other products too minimalist and, in fact, impossible to use (Zoho Wiki for example), Google Sites is the perfect start point. So it is a real know-how at Google and a true example to follow.
  • Types of pages: QuickPlace had created this concept for web workspaces in 1998, we had improved it in 2000 with mayeticVillage, JotSpot had invented it in wikis in 2005, and the Google Sites produced it to my greatest pleasure (and that of its Users ;-)). It is clear that in a workspace, web pages should be typed according to the content created or the application focused. Google has done it by allowing
    you to select for each new page if it will be a normal page, or a dashboard page, or a mini-database page, or a mini-file manager, or a mini-blog (annouvements…).
  • Mini-database: Google calls it a “list” type of page. It offers predefined types of lists, but in fact everything is customizable as a small database, where you can create fields, associate types, default values (check box, dropdown list, etc. .. .) and so on. It works really well, and there was also something already invented by QuickPlace few years ago, and adopted then by mayeticVillage.
  • Integration of gadgets: (gadgets are the Google equivalent of widgets) any page may contain gadgets. This can range from a simple weather gadget to the display of his pwn calendar, or a Google Docs documents, or a spreadsheet, etc…. So you can produce composite pages, and actually begin to replicate what is possible to do with MS Office and OLE objects on a PC workstation. So you can display a Spreadsheet into a page that has been created in Google Sites, in the middle of any regular text. BUT … These objects are only in visualization mode, therefore no change in the gadget is possible. We must start the calendar application for example to create an event. And on the other hand some apps like spreadsheed seems impose to be first published, which is a very limited thing, since only documents visible to the general public would be publishable. Surprising, but we hope that Google will correct this very quickly.
  • Display in two columns: this is a little thing, but very practical, to be capable of displaying 2 columns of content in a page. But it is very convenient, and it makes much more readable text, especially on very large screens as they are done now.

So Google Sites is a real step forward for Google Apps, on the one hand because Google Sites becomes the main anchor of any project. Any project in a company using Google Apps will create its Google Site repository for all the information and the documents of the project, and will serve of control tower for all the information created beside (Spreadsheet, Presenter, …). And using Google Docs (the equivalent of MS Word) will be very limited, since the majority of textual information will be produced in Google Sites directly.

Another big limit raised anyway:

  • Nothing is exportable, and therefore all the work done in a Site is not transferable to another Site. A real headache, especially if we began to set lists. Google should at least create the concept of template Site, as well as put in place a genuine function of export / import data from one Site to another. Otherwise it is not possible to capitalize on his work, and for professional use and large-scale companies it could be a real problem.

Identificateurs Technorati : , , , ,

Some limitations of Google Sites

Miguel March 15th, 2008

After a few days of use for some of my clients, we can already identify gaps in Google Sites:

  1. It is not possible to create a page when you are in edition mode, as in a regular wiki. Google Sites therefore withdrew an essential function that is characteristic of a wiki, forcing users to first create pages before you can link to this pages. This is obviously stupid, even though at first glance it seems easier for novices.
  2. There is no RSS feeds in Google Sites! One can only subscribe to the changes by e-mail! And there is not compatible gadget available in iGoogle for Sites, therefore impossible to track changes made to its site within iGoogle!
  3. SOLVED You can not compare two versions of a page, we can only view them. So easily impossible to know what differentiates one version from the other.
  4. Nothing is exportable, and therefore all the work done in a Site is not transferable to another Site. A real headache, especially if we began to set lists. Google should at least create the concept of template Site, as well as put in place a genuine function of export / import data from one Site to another. Otherwise it is not possible to capitalize on his work, and for professional use and large-scale companies it could be a real problem.

Point 2 is essential (RSS) to be able to create real dashboards for monitoring, without being obliged to receive tons of emails for each modification. This goes against the 2.0 paradigm and new methods of work that relies on non isage of e-mails to be effective.

Relating point 1 once we have learn to create new pages on the fly in a regular wiki (ie 5mn when done for the first time), we never want to do it in another way, so easy and natural it is, and it is the very heart of the success of wikis all these years, it is extremely surprising that this option is not implemented in this first version, it was mostly available at JotSpot of course.

It is a gross misjudgement from the product manager of Google Sites :-(

Goto Google Apps Feedback Zone if you want to share dynamically your feedback with other users.

Identificateurs Technorati : , , ,

From Collaboration to Participation

Miguel March 15th, 2008

For more than 25 years, asynchronous collaboration tools have been used by thousands of companies all over the world. Technologies have evolved from Lotus Notes to web-based self-service collaborative environments like eRoom, QuickPlace or SharePoint Portal Server, just to name the most popular ones. And today there are dozens of such products. What is the feedback of such dissemination? Are employees working better in their daily life? Are all employees using collaborative tools at their desktop?

The answer is NO! The most used collaborative tool is still the electronic messaging system. Why? Because e-mail is an unstructured way to send and share information; an immediate and effortless system. When you enable people and teams to work with powerful collaborative tools, you notice that it takes time for them to consider these tools as part of their daily work.

Continue Reading »

Benioff (Salesforce.com) and Plattner (SAP) at Churchill Club

Miguel March 14th, 2008

Don’t miss this event if you are in San Francisco April 3rd: a debate with Marc Benioff, founder, chairman & CEO of salesforce.com, the world’s leading independent SaaS provider, and Hasso Plattner, co-founder, ex-CEO and chairman of SAP, the world’s largest business software company.

All the information here, entrance reserved to the members (it’s easy to become a member). I will not be able to attend, so if somebody reports the debate on his blog, please let us know :-).

Identificateurs Technorati : , , , ,

The Participative Web

Miguel March 6th, 2008

Web 2.0 and the Participative Era, or how the New Applications of Web 2.0 are Going to Revolutionize Everything up to our Enterprises and our Democracies by Liberating the Participative Spirit the Human Beings Seem to Possess.

Continue Reading »

Google Sites launched !

Miguel February 28th, 2008

Here it is, the first beta version of former JotSpot, a company acquired by Google there is a little more than a year, was released officially today and is available in all packs Google Apps, under the name of Google Sites.

This is a major step for Google in its strategy of winning companies, as online office was not sufficient to justify a migration of the existing major accounts.

But Google Sites completely change the situation, as it is a wiki, which also includes a kind of blog (annoucements feature) and a set of other features, and Google will thus be able to implement a true architecture of Enterprise 2.0.

Because in the information system of an Enterprise 2.0, the three foundations are the wiki, the blog and RSS portal. The wiki is used to collaboration, the blog to communicate and the portal for consumption data thanks to RSS feeds.

With these three bricks, no more need to use messaging and to store its files in file servers. EVERYTHING IS STORED IN THE BLOG AND THE WIKI, for all projects of the company, and it is immediately notified about additions and changes that both sides have made, consulting its portal feeds.

The blog and wiki from Google Apps is called “Sites” and the RSS portal is called “Start page.”

Google Apps today becomes the first thrue suite for Enterprise 2.0 market and there is no reluctance to have to put Google Apps in direct competition with any traditional solution from Microsoft or IBM. And both for small companies than for large accounts with tens of thousands of users.

At a time when Microsoft makes the feet and hands to try to catch up on Google in the field of research on the Internet and online advertising, Google has finalized deadly weapon to kill the cash cow for Microsoft, Office / Exchange / SharePoint.

It is a day that could almost be described as historic because it is for 20 years that Microsoft has no competitor in the workstation area… This monopoly has now been broken.

It will be remembered for a long time, therefore this date in the future, it was Feb. 28, 2008, at 9:39 hour of San Francisco time :-)

This is the first message from Google received this morning:

Greetings!

We’re contacting everyone who’s expressed interest in learning of JotSpot registration re-openings on the JotSpot website. And today, we’re excited to announce that JotSpot is working on Google infrastructure and has been re-launched as Google Sites.

Google Sites is the latest offering from Google Apps, a suite of products designed to improve communication and collaboration amongst employees, students, and groups. Google Sites makes creating a team web site as easy as editing a document. You can quickly gather a variety of information in one place  — including videos, calendars, presentations, attachments, and gadgets — and easily share it for viewing or editing with a small group, their entire organization, or the world.

To get started with Google Sites, you’ll first need to sign up forthe Google Apps edition that’s right for you (if you’re not already a Google Apps user). Start the sign-up process at:

http://sites.google.com

Sincerely,

The Google Apps Team
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043

Identificateurs Technorati : , , , , , , ,

Zoho wiki: Don’t use it, it is a nightmare

Miguel January 3rd, 2008

I liked Zoho products, but their wiki is a real nightmare. I’m using it with a group of students because their university decided to use Zoho online office suite, and it is totally unusable. Zoho doesn’t have understood the wiki philisophy. And there is a lot of bugs! So, don’t use it.

Use netcipia, wikidot or pbwiki instead, they are true wikis, with a real usability.

(disclosure: I’m cofounder of netcipia. This is also why I know what a wiki must be…)

Next »